trial #2
![]() Complex Population: 32 At noon, the same tone from the morning rings out, and Judy's voice filters out over the intercom. "Good afternoon, residents. As per Safety Protocol 6227-A, it is time to conduct a trial to bring justice for the victim. Please proceed to the courtroom on the first level." Just as at night, if you don't go to the courtroom, you'll be treated to an electric shock of increasing strength until you go to the courtroom or are unconscious. Though considering the ominous penalty for not participating in a trial, you should likely just go rather than risk not voting because you've been knocked out by your own stubbornness... Once you're in the courtroom, you'll find that bottled water and light snacks are provided, but otherwise you'll have to bring anything else you may need. As you come to your conclusions about who to vote for, you can step into the judgement theater to cast your vote at the terminal. You may change your vote as many times as you'd like, but at 7PM, your vote (or lack thereof) is locked in. You have until 7PM to discuss and vote for who you think the murderer is. ic rulebook character statuses character profiles Voting will close at 9PM EST on 10/15. voting |
no subject
I cannot speak for Elizabeth, but I believe neither of us would have considered Diva had it not been for the fact she attacked the victim at all. You are forgetting that neither of us were the ones to bring up Diva's involvement with Charles - as far as I know, neither of us were even aware they had spoken.
What else do you want to know, Franziska?
no subject
no subject
[just asking, for real.]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm not ready to point fingers yet either but I also know it's incredibly foolish to eliminate somebody for being too obvious. Anybody knows that that would be precisely what a murderer would want in a case like this. It's human nature to brush over the obvious but...why? Why shouldn't it get the same treatment?
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Listen, at this point, we probably shouldn't rule anything out. If that ended up being the case, then it worked and we took the bait.
no subject
I was so sure of it. Nothing else made sense. I should have questioned myself more - [ but this isn't #manpain hour ] But you're right. When we took everyone else off the table, that's when we made our mistake. We made too strong of a case for Diva.
no subject
no subject
I promise you, Alvin. I'd never hurt a child. You can take that to the bank.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
[They haven't pressed him yet, that's for sure.]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I mean, I would have brought it up myself if I saw it. I think anyone here would have.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I do think it interesting, the sudden shift towards Leo Baskerville. Even from someone who was initially hesitant to name names. Don't you?
no subject
We're running low on time, so I think people are getting desperate again. ♡
no subject
no subject
no subject
[if anyone could be staff, anyone could be lying—alvin might know this better than most people just from being a mercenary for so many years and having done the lying, even when it threw people he loved under the bus.]
no subject
no subject
[which is the exact opposite of promising.]
no subject
[Not that Alvin was trying to be... but at least he's being honest.]
I wish we could try to find an alternative, but after what happened last time... it would probably be best to make our best guess. [Considering he's on the suspect list, this probably isn't the best suggestion to make, but. It is true.] But even saying that, I don't feel comfortable voting for someone with no evidence at all. No matter what Miss Prosecutor says.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)