judgejudy: (Default)
mod journal for 62 ([personal profile] judgejudy) wrote in [community profile] 622016-10-15 10:40 am

trial #2





DAY 4 (afternoon)
Complex Population: 32



At noon, the same tone from the morning rings out, and Judy's voice filters out over the intercom.

"Good afternoon, residents. As per Safety Protocol 6227-A, it is time to conduct a trial to bring justice for the victim. Please proceed to the courtroom on the first level."

Just as at night, if you don't go to the courtroom, you'll be treated to an electric shock of increasing strength until you go to the courtroom or are unconscious. Though considering the ominous penalty for not participating in a trial, you should likely just go rather than risk not voting because you've been knocked out by your own stubbornness... Once you're in the courtroom, you'll find that bottled water and light snacks are provided, but otherwise you'll have to bring anything else you may need.

As you come to your conclusions about who to vote for, you can step into the judgement theater to cast your vote at the terminal. You may change your vote as many times as you'd like, but at 7PM, your vote (or lack thereof) is locked in.

You have until 7PM to discuss and vote for who you think the murderer is.



ic rulebook
character statuses
character profiles

Voting will close at 9PM EST on 10/15.

voting

subsisted: (the darkness that you felt)

[personal profile] subsisted 2016-10-15 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I believe it was him, yes. If I'm not mistaken, she eliminated Leo for being too obvious. [ does she agree with that? who knows. ] I'll say that sometimes the most obvious answer can be the correct one... I - I'm not ready to point a finger, though.
Edited 2016-10-15 23:12 (UTC)
chiseler: (say it again)

[personal profile] chiseler 2016-10-15 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
[The face he makes in response is enough to tell Lara that he thinks that's really stupid.]

I'm not ready to point fingers yet either but I also know it's incredibly foolish to eliminate somebody for being too obvious. Anybody knows that that would be precisely what a murderer would want in a case like this. It's human nature to brush over the obvious but...why? Why shouldn't it get the same treatment?
subsisted: (let me into your encryption)

[personal profile] subsisted 2016-10-15 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not the prosecutor. [ bitterly. ] But you're right. He deserves to have his name cleared like we all do.
chiseler: (ain't it strange?)

[personal profile] chiseler 2016-10-15 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
If it's really like he says that he told Ms. Von Karma everything already, then his answers should be exactly the same. If not...well, then we have a real problem.