judgejudy: (Default)
mod journal for 62 ([personal profile] judgejudy) wrote in [community profile] 622016-10-22 08:47 am

trial #3





DAY 6 (afternoon)
Complex Population: 27



At noon, the same tone from the morning rings out, and Judy's voice filters out over the intercom.

"Good afternoon, residents. As per Safety Protocol 6227-A, it is time to conduct a trial to bring justice for the victim. Please proceed to the courtroom on the first level."

Just as at night, if you don't go to the courtroom, you'll be treated to an electric shock of increasing strength until you go to the courtroom or are unconscious. Though considering the ominous penalty for not participating in a trial, you should likely just go rather than risk not voting because you've been knocked out by your own stubbornness... Once you're in the courtroom, you'll find that bottled water and light snacks are provided, but otherwise you'll have to bring anything else you may need.

As you come to your conclusions about who to vote for, you can step into the judgement theater to cast your vote at the terminal. You may change your vote as many times as you'd like, but at 7PM, your vote (or lack thereof) is locked in.

You have until 7PM to discuss and vote for who you think the murderer is.



ic rulebook
character statuses
character profiles

Voting will close at 9PM EST on 10/22.

voting

selfsufficiency: (top of my class in the navy seals)

[personal profile] selfsufficiency 2016-10-22 11:36 pm (UTC)(link)
It works both ways, though. We can ask about who abstained now so we know who's lying to us today, and we can ask about who voted for Lara later.

I'd rather have a known liar than risk getting the name of someone who was just misled by Franzy last time, you know? Choosing from eight people still poses a risk.
daturah: by valleyforge (pic#10644557)

[personal profile] daturah 2016-10-22 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I have no problem with either option, but I vote for who abstained because I have nothing to hide.

If I get a vote, I mean.
becauseimacoward: (20)

[personal profile] becauseimacoward 2016-10-22 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
[Judy broadcasted as an answer "I would be willing to offer it in future trials, but that is my choice. I will make a decision based on this exercise." After that is said, Dojima nods]

That's certainly something to remember, too. I agree with finding out who abstained, then.

I guess 100% chance is better than less than 100%, since there may not be a chance to find out votes in the future.

[So yeah, find out who abstained, please!]
Edited (Judy, not Alice, damn it) 2016-10-22 23:57 (UTC)