judgejudy: (Default)
mod journal for 62 ([personal profile] judgejudy) wrote in [community profile] 622016-10-15 10:40 am

trial #2





DAY 4 (afternoon)
Complex Population: 32



At noon, the same tone from the morning rings out, and Judy's voice filters out over the intercom.

"Good afternoon, residents. As per Safety Protocol 6227-A, it is time to conduct a trial to bring justice for the victim. Please proceed to the courtroom on the first level."

Just as at night, if you don't go to the courtroom, you'll be treated to an electric shock of increasing strength until you go to the courtroom or are unconscious. Though considering the ominous penalty for not participating in a trial, you should likely just go rather than risk not voting because you've been knocked out by your own stubbornness... Once you're in the courtroom, you'll find that bottled water and light snacks are provided, but otherwise you'll have to bring anything else you may need.

As you come to your conclusions about who to vote for, you can step into the judgement theater to cast your vote at the terminal. You may change your vote as many times as you'd like, but at 7PM, your vote (or lack thereof) is locked in.

You have until 7PM to discuss and vote for who you think the murderer is.



ic rulebook
character statuses
character profiles

Voting will close at 9PM EST on 10/15.

voting

chiseler: (like a bomb threat)

[personal profile] chiseler 2016-10-16 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
I agree with both of those, but I don't think it's a bad idea to at least bring it up. I find it weird that Judy would even tell us that's an option. Okay, let's pretend voting for Judy's off the table. What's your idea Shijima?
liven: art credit unknown, please contact (CHAT ► well that's dumb.)

[personal profile] liven 2016-10-16 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
Vote for whomever I'm told to vote for.

[ LMAO....... ]

I think the technology angle is less useful than the conjecture angle, however. Anyone can lie about their relative skill with such a thing.
chiseler: (you're getting better all the time)

[personal profile] chiseler 2016-10-16 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
That. No. [Shijima??????] But you might not be wrong. Anybody can lie about knowing how to do something or not do something. Maybe in the days to come we should start testing people.
liven: (REMARK ► whatever don't care.)

[personal profile] liven 2016-10-16 01:06 am (UTC)(link)
Tests can be failed on purpose, too.
chiseler: (nothing left to lose)

[personal profile] chiseler 2016-10-16 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
Doesn't it take more effort to fail a test if it's something on instinct?
liven: art credit unknown, please contact (CHAT ► well that's dumb.)

[personal profile] liven 2016-10-16 01:18 am (UTC)(link)
How do we plan to test computer skills on instinct...?