judgejudy: (Default)
mod journal for 62 ([personal profile] judgejudy) wrote in [community profile] 622016-10-15 10:40 am

trial #2





DAY 4 (afternoon)
Complex Population: 32



At noon, the same tone from the morning rings out, and Judy's voice filters out over the intercom.

"Good afternoon, residents. As per Safety Protocol 6227-A, it is time to conduct a trial to bring justice for the victim. Please proceed to the courtroom on the first level."

Just as at night, if you don't go to the courtroom, you'll be treated to an electric shock of increasing strength until you go to the courtroom or are unconscious. Though considering the ominous penalty for not participating in a trial, you should likely just go rather than risk not voting because you've been knocked out by your own stubbornness... Once you're in the courtroom, you'll find that bottled water and light snacks are provided, but otherwise you'll have to bring anything else you may need.

As you come to your conclusions about who to vote for, you can step into the judgement theater to cast your vote at the terminal. You may change your vote as many times as you'd like, but at 7PM, your vote (or lack thereof) is locked in.

You have until 7PM to discuss and vote for who you think the murderer is.



ic rulebook
character statuses
character profiles

Voting will close at 9PM EST on 10/15.

voting

daturah: (pic#10647389)

[personal profile] daturah 2016-10-15 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Adam.

[At least he gets it]

How would you respond to far fetched crack theories when you feel your life is on the line?
antietam: (pic#10376471)

[personal profile] antietam 2016-10-15 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)
... I guess I'd cling to anything, particularly something that would point to someone who isn't me.

And that's exactly what the staff members want. We need to encourage everyone to be logical.
daturah: (pic#10647631)

[personal profile] daturah 2016-10-15 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)
There will be people who will shoot down anything that might be helpful, as well.
antietam: (pic#10376474)

[personal profile] antietam 2016-10-15 06:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Of course. And we need to keep an eye out for them.

What do you think we should do? You must have had an idea.
daturah: (pic#10647378)

[personal profile] daturah 2016-10-15 06:53 pm (UTC)(link)
[She hesitates, and for once, it's not out of false modesty.]

As it is, the lack of evidence works against us. We only have guessing to depend on. The staff, on the other hand, have enough ammunition aside from leverage to shut down our progress.

If we're going to play a game of elimination, our only chance is to watch out for mistakes
daturah: (pic#10647381)

[personal profile] daturah 2016-10-15 06:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I know it's not a great suggestion, but we need leverage on our side too and all we have our wits and threats, and the latter wasn't helpful last time because it wasn't the right sort of threat.
antietam: (pic#9385155)

[personal profile] antietam 2016-10-15 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I get it. I think you're right, we can't afford more mistakes or we're just doing their job for them.

But what sort of leverage can we have?
daturah: (pic#10647393)

[personal profile] daturah 2016-10-15 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)
We have to possess something that they need from us.

I'm sorry. That's the only thing I can come up with.