If the staff did not know whether votes would be anonymous, or if they were somehow required to abstain in the first trial - that would make it important for the staff to try to subtly influence others to vote, wouldn't it?
Why would Her Honor have believed it was possible for everyone to abstain if the staff were able to vote to disrupt a unanimous abstention?
no subject
If the staff did not know whether votes would be anonymous, or if they were somehow required to abstain in the first trial - that would make it important for the staff to try to subtly influence others to vote, wouldn't it?
Why would Her Honor have believed it was possible for everyone to abstain if the staff were able to vote to disrupt a unanimous abstention?