karmas: (a: ha.)
Franziska von Karma ([personal profile] karmas) wrote in [community profile] 62 2016-10-15 05:45 pm (UTC)

But that makes it more interesting, doesn't it?

If the staff did not know whether votes would be anonymous, or if they were somehow required to abstain in the first trial - that would make it important for the staff to try to subtly influence others to vote, wouldn't it?

Why would Her Honor have believed it was possible for everyone to abstain if the staff were able to vote to disrupt a unanimous abstention?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting