judgejudy: (Default)
mod journal for 62 ([personal profile] judgejudy) wrote in [community profile] 62 2016-10-22 11:21 pm (UTC)

Correct. Revealing the votes is unconventional, since the anonymity is a courtesy, but there is no regulation against it.

[ There's a pause like Judy is considering something ]

For the purpose of your request, it is somewhat irrelevant, but as this would be setting a precedent, I would at least like to lay a ground rule. I will not reveal all of the votes from a previous trial. But I will reveal all votes associated with one choice, where all of you may pick whichever choice you are interested in.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting