liven: (UGH ► not this shit again.)
shijima kurookano ([personal profile] liven) wrote in [community profile] 62 2016-10-22 08:07 pm (UTC)

Not exactly. Luke was who I found most suspicious last time. He wasn't the loudest, but he was the person my instincts least trusted. Things that didn't add up, false or not, and how he reacted when questioned about those things. I do not think all of us will simply vote for whomever is loudest.

[ but, whatever. she tbh does not think...they are unified enough for it to matter... ]

I did not see her reasoning towards Lara as holding water...I said so, I think, or at least said I found it more likely Luke was the staff member in her list. But it is true it persuaded enough people. And very likely some of those were staff, taking advantage of the way the wind was blowing.

I do not think it likely we will avoid the deaths of more innocents. If we simply choose to abstain or vote for the least likely culprits every time, to make ourselves feel better for not being certain, then of course we will often damn those who are innocent by the rules here to death, time and again. It's obvious by now that we will never be certain. Lara's blood isn't only on Franziska's hands, but also on all of ours. Luke's, obviously. But all of those who wasted their time saying only true hard evidence would earn their vote and then split things a thousand ways.

Some of those who didn't vote for Luke said they thought he was likely, and yet they voted elsewhere because they were not certain. The cost is one we must get accustomed to if we are unwilling to change our ways.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting